Procrastination: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly

There are a couple of common misconceptions about procrastinators that have caused great confusion as to what procrastination really means. This flexibility can actually cause more harm than good. The most prominent place that this problem has penetrated is the shared space we call social media. I’ve seen a large number of posts where people reveal the extent of their procrastination. They usually go something like “I’m busy binge-watching anime like I don’t have an exam tomorrow morning”. What this does is that it makes us feel better about our own situations. We start to think ‘Alright, at least I’m not alone’ or ‘Alright, at least I’m not that bad’. I always equate this to the feeling I got when (in high school) I asked a fellow classmate about a test we had that day and they responded with “What test?”

The reason for this sudden increase in comfort is because our brain likes to reward us for sticking to the buddy system; ‘There’s safety in numbers’ type of thing. Being the outlier in a situation is always uncomfortable because you’re exposed to the elements. Like a discarded Spartan baby, we long for the pleasure and comfort that community can provide.

Procrastination is the delaying of something (let’s say work). By this definition, we can see that we’re all procrastinators in one-way shape or form. Cleaning your room before studying is considered procrastinating, as is getting high and watching TV. Either way, you’re procrastinating. It’s usually the latter of these two that is given the most flack. This is because there are varying degrees of procrastination; it would help to use the spectrum paradigm to visualise this.

While delaying something for 10 minutes and delaying something for 10 days are both considered procrastination, we can easily imagine there are different impacts of these actions. Postponing something indefinitely could still count as procrastination and this is where we encroach on bum territory. For this reason, it is important (for our discussion) that we distinguish between successful, semi-successful, and unsuccessful procrastination. The axiomatic criteria, for successful, is that the work gets done on time; semi-success is where the work gets done but not on time; unsuccessful, as you may have guessed, is where the work is never completed. (Homeless people are not bums! But that’s a topic for another day).

To envision this, let’s look at one of, if not, the most famous stories of procrastination. The tortoise vs the hare. The hare took an early, commanding lead and then decided to nap a little. The tortoise took the lead and made it to spitting distance of the finish line before the hare realised her mistake. The tortoise won and the hare was humiliated. The difference between a successful procrastinator and an unsuccessful one is the knowledge of self and an understanding of the task at hand; semi-successful ones usually have only one of either. A good procrastinator knows exactly what she’s capable of, what the task requires of her, and leaves as little to chance as possible. The good procrastinator will leave everything to the last minute if she knows that the job can be done in less.

To put this in our story, the hare should have known how fast it could get to the finish line on a bad day. Then she could have analysed the pace of the tortoise and figured out how long it would take him to get to the finish line. With that knowledge, she could figure out how long she could delay her sprint for. She could also decide whether or not she would sleep closer to the start, the finish, or in intervals between the two.

In summation, procrastination is like project management with the project manager as the sole human resource.

8 thoughts on “Procrastination: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly

    1. At the beginning of the article, I defined procrastination as the delaying of something. Would you not say that taking a nap in the middle of a task counts as procrastination? over self-confidence is what caused the hare to take that nap but the nap itself is a form of procrastination.


      1. As I have said, the delaying of a task is considered procrastinating. For whatever reason, the hare delayed the task at hand. The reason (“over self-confidence” as you put it) is irrelevant when defining if it is procrastination or not. I further (in the article) went on to say that semi-successful procrastinators, have either a knowledge of self (which can lead to overconfidence) or an understanding of the task but never both.


      2. Yes, but not all delaying of tasks is procrastination. If I chew my meal, or suck my sweets slowly to prolong the pleasure I’m not procrastinating. The etymology of procrastination comes from the Latin “procrastination” literally, to put off until tomorrow, and it implies a laziness or even a fear of success, but not the idea of not making an effort because one feels superior, that is a different kind of vice.


      3. To delay or postpone a task is the definition of procrastination. If you thought I meant “prolonging” when I said ‘delay’ then I apologise. The statement still stands though. The origin of the word does nothing but perpetuate this unnecessary battle of semantics. If you believe that the hare didn’t procrastinate then so be it. Human language is inherently subjective. The leason to be learnt from this article is that one shouldn’t chastise themselves for procrastinating if its in their nature, Instead, one should strive to be as effecient as possible within the bounds of said nature.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: